FIND A SUPPLIER

Here are five big-picture considerations to shop automation:

1.  To reduce labor costs. Automation is already replacing human labor in areas such as picking and moving parts, assembly, inspection and more.
2. To eliminate waste. In manufacturing, human error leads to wasted time and resources. Computers and machines can do many things faster and more accurately than humans – without making mistakes.
3. For lightning-fast turnaround times. Automation lets you process orders faster, reduce setup and production times, and get your product out the door quicker.
4. To improve quality and safety. Rework due to poor quality acts like an anchor on production time and lowers customer satisfaction. Workers’ comp costs can put large dents in your bottom line. Automating processes in these areas can raise quality ratings while making your workplace safer for employees.
5. To future proof your business. Automation improves the ability to forecast trends, see how customer needs will change, and prepare for them from a technology and strategy standpoint so you can get there ahead of the competition. Automating the data-gathering process with dashboards provides immediate access to accurate, real-time data while reporting or displaying it in any format you choose.

(Source: 5 Reasons to Consider Automation)

The current method of processing five sides of a detail is very labor- and time-intensive and requires highly skilled mold builders. An alternative solution is a closed-loop tolerance control process that hard mills geometry for roughing and semi-finishing in hardened materials up to 95 HRA in carbide. Then, in the same setup, the machine verifies the tolerance using a probe in the spindle. Next, you grind the 2D geometries in the same machine and setup, including bores, bosses, pockets or free-form contours using chop, contour or face grinding. Verifying the grinding process follows. Finally, you use a spindle probe to confirm if the material is within a specified tolerance or rewind and apply cutter compensation.

This automated approach frees up your skilled workforce for other tasks. It also maximizes the utilization of your machining centers by finishing many geometries in one setup on one platform, although, it does not entirely replace your grinders.

(Source: How to Cut Mold Machining Costs in Half)

There are eight specific areas of mold design during which the right decision can avoid problems for the robot or automation supplier and possibly save money on the purchase, installation or operation of the equipment. But compromise is always going to be necessary, so each of the following tips can be read with the assumption that they are preceded by the phrase, “If possible.”

1. Do not place inserts on the same side of the mold from where parts will be removed.

When the molded part requires inserts, it is always better to design the mold with the inserts positioned on one side of the mold and the parts retained on and removed from the other. This approach permits insert and part grippers on opposite sides of the robot’s vertical arm and avoids problems. 

2. Avoid mold-locked parts.

Robots are not designed to physically pull a part off of a core or out of a cavity, as that movement places undesirable stress on the grippers and the arm. Avoid any mold lock or undercut, so when everything is working properly, the mold ejector system will start pushing the part out of the mold, and the robot only needs to grab the part and extract it from the mold.

3. Design the mold, so it shuts off on the inserts.

A robot is not designed to take an insert to a hard stop or to seat the insert in a position on the mold because these movements put unnecessary stress and wear on the robot. Instead, position inserts at a mold shutoff, so the mold closing pushes the insert into its final position. This is a simple way to ensure that the insert(s) cannot slip out of position due to machine vibration or material flow.

4. Watch what you put on top of the mold.

A molding machine that must wait an extra fraction of a second for a robot to get out of the way will increase costs over time. The key is to minimize the amount of gear on top of the mold, such as electrical boxes, water lines, or even slides or unscrewing actuators. If possible, mount this extra ‘stuff’ on the side of the mold, so it does not interfere with the robot as the mold closes.

5. Pay attention to gating.

All other things being equal, robot manufacturers will always prefer to automate a hot runner mold. The robot cycle is shorter (less time spent outside the mold) since there are no additional operations needed to separate parts from the runners, which is important for a fast-cycling part where the robot cycle time could be a limiting factor. The EOAT can be much simpler, too, since gripping and degating the runner will not require additional components. 

Cold runner subgate or tunnel gate systems are the next most automation-friendly approach since degating is accomplished by the mold opening or by the ejection system. The robot only needs to pick the parts as they eject, and the runner simply falls out of the way, or more commonly, the robot picks both parts and runners and deposits them separately.

6. Locate left- and right-hand cavities.

Often parts must be molded in two opposite-handed configurations in the same mold. When two parts are molded in a four-cavity mold, it is common to see the like cavities positioned diagonally to one another. For example, one left-hand part is molded in the upper left corner of the mold and the other in the lower right corner with the right-hand components in the other corners. This approach is used to balance material flow or to simplify gating, but it does create problems when it comes to automation.

7. Use mold locators.

Be generous in the use of mold-locating features. A center sprue bushing is enough to center the mold on the platen, but even a torpedo level is not accurate enough to ensure the mold is perfectly plumb and level. If a mold is not remounted exactly the same way every time, it may be necessary to reprogram critical robot positions to ensure proper operation, or you may need to reposition the mold. In either case, these adjustments increase mold changeover time and impact productivity.

8. Design the sprue and runner with gripping in mind.

In most cases, the robot is going to need to grip not only the parts but also the runner. So, the moldmaker must include features in the sprue/runner system that the robot can grip. Options can be as simple as using a one-inch-long sprue or building one or more vacuum pads (half-inch circular pockets along the length of the runner), which are inexpensive vacuum cups on which the EOAT can latch. Although both options yield a nominal increase in runner material waste, molders will see the return on investment in reliable runner removal.

(Source: 8 Mold Design Decisions That Impact Automation)

Companies should approach the question of whether to use cobots in the same way they approach other business decisions. Cobots can provide tremendous value, but their implementation necessitates proper application. For example, companies need to consider whether the cobots would have jobs that bring the cobots near humans, jobs with smaller payloads or jobs without high-speed cycle time requirements. Do not get caught up in the hype. Evaluate the bottom line, and consider both direct and indirect costs and benefits.

When determining the ROI, be sure to identify the objectives of the project first. The objectives could be both qualitative and quantitative, but even the qualitative ones should have value associated with them. For example, are you looking to reduce costs, improve productivity or increase product quality? These can all be assigned a metric. Offset the benefits with the true cost of implementation, which includes the initial purchase, reduced throughput, labor impact and cobot lifespan. Remember that businesses make good investments when they have a strong understanding and definition of expectations and costs.

(Source: The True Cost of Cobots)

Designate a leader. From organization to execution, an ultimate decision maker should manage every aspect of robot maintenance. Also, in the event the scope of a project should veer off course, this designated leader can intervene to make tough decisions.

Follow best practices. Technicians should consider past lessons from previous maintenance sessions and ensure any repair or upgrade is consistent with current manufacturer recommendations. Similarly, give any technicians who will be responsible for maintenance or repair the proper training and tools to complete the job. In preparation, employees may benefit from robot training and a web-based robot maintenance system.

Deploy a smart inventory strategy. To prevent downtime or to avoid costly lead times, technicians should determine parts to order and have on hand. Common items to keep in stock are gaskets, gasket covers, connectors, seals, cables, teach pendants, gear oil, grease for bearings and controller batteries or air filters. To determine when future parts may be necessary, leading manufacturers heavily rely on software-based data collection and visualization tools that visually display the status and health of factory equipment in real time.

Perform a grease analysis. Because well-lubricated robot axes help control friction, vibration and heat, manufacturers should periodically check and re-grease each axis with the recommended OEM grease. Doing this helps maintain proper levels of viscosity in the grease, often preventing costly repairs. While some buildup of ferrous naturally happens, a spike in the content of one or more axes can hint that there is a potential problem with the drive.

Schedule a “holiday shutdown.” While the words “holiday shutdown” may induce panic throughout some organizations, many companies have embraced the concept, where a skeleton crew performs robot upgrades, preventive maintenance and process improvements during a designated period. Because time is limited, management should communicate in advance specific goals with achievable steps. This plan should list the projects to be done, state who is responsible for each task and give a detailed logistical workflow. Also, any external contractors required to help should be scheduled six to eight months in advance.

Meet with an OEM technical manager. Whether your organization will be taking on the responsibility of regular maintenance or an annual shutdown, a planning session with a technical manager from your robot OEM is suggested. Open communication with an expert can guide technicians in emergency situations, as well as aid in executing a successful overall strategy.

Look to the future. While robots have come a long way, they still require regular maintenance to ensure peak performance, maximizing ROI. When the team addresses any issue, the designated leader should record the procedures that worked and what did not. Regardless of the revelations, every employee should be proactive in managing risks for future success.

(Source: How to Maintain and/or Upgrade a Robot)